Chip Bets Lost $52 Million in 10 Minutes with Wall Street Closed
In ten minutes on Saturday night, around $52 million in leveraged positions linked to semiconductor stocks were liquidated on cryptocurrency exchanges. Wall Street was closed. The underlying stocks were not moving. And yet, traders lost tens of millions trading contracts that attempted to replicate the price of shares that no one could buy or sell in the traditional market.
The episode is a stark portrait of a growing phenomenon in the market: trading real-world assets through perpetual futures on crypto platforms, which operate 24/7. The promise is to provide continuous access to traditional markets. The risk, as became clear, is that liquidity evaporates when the price reference disappears.
What Happened Between 21:22 and 21:32 UTC
According to data from the CoinGlass platform, approximately $51.6 million in positions linked to chip stocks and semiconductor funds were forcibly liquidated in the span of ten minutes. Of the total, about $38 million came from traders betting on rising prices, known as longs.
The SOXL fund, which leverages triple the daily movements of semiconductor stocks, accounted for the largest volume of liquidations: about $12.7 million. Following were contracts for SanDisk and SK Hynix, with approximately $10.8 million each.
The sequence of forced sales began on Binance, where a trader identified as David Jeong, CEO of trading firm Tread.fi, executed the first relevant sell orders on SanDisk and Micron contracts at 21:21:59 UTC. Less than a second later, similar orders arrived at Hyperliquid, another crypto exchange. About ten addresses opened short positions on six chip-linked contracts in just 1.8 seconds.
Binance processed approximately $21.9 million in SanDisk volume in that first minute, compared to $3.1 million on Trade XYZ, a platform listing stock tracking contracts on Hyperliquid. The volume asymmetry shows that the cascade of liquidations concentrated where there were more leveraged positions open.
The Problem of Trading Without Price Reference
The crux of this story is not the value lost per se, but the mechanism that made the loss possible. Perpetual futures are popular derivative contracts in the crypto universe that have no expiration date and use a funding rate to keep the contract price close to that of the underlying asset. When the underlying asset is a cryptocurrency like Bitcoin or Ethereum, this works reasonably well because the reference market also operates 24/7.
When the underlying asset is a stock listed on a U.S. exchange, the logic changes radically. On weekends, there is no real price being formed. The rules of Trade XYZ, for example, allow the platform itself to set internal reference prices until Wall Street quotes return on Monday. Traders end up reacting only to each other, without an anchor in the real world. It’s like playing poker where no one knows how much the chips are worth.
This dynamic artificially amplifies volatility. A large enough sell order pushes the perpetual price down, triggering the automatic liquidation of a leveraged trader, whose position is forcibly sold, pushing the price down further, and so on. The result is a self-feeding cascade, as we explained in previous analyses on leverage risks.
The Context of Semiconductors During the Week
The episode did not happen in a vacuum. Memory chip stocks had already been under pressure during the week, with investors reassessing the competitive landscape following advances by Chinese firm CXMT in the segment. The narrative that Chinese manufacturers are becoming competitive in DRAM memory chips pressured stocks like SK Hynix and Micron in regular trading.
Part of the traders who held long positions in perpetual contracts for chips likely already carried accumulated losses from the week. With reduced margins, they became even more vulnerable to any sharp movements over the weekend. Those who understand how derivatives work in the crypto market know that leverage in a market without liquidity is a historically destructive combination.
The question the market will answer at the opening on Monday is how much the prices of perpetuals over the weekend deviated from reality. If chip stocks open stable or up, traders who were liquidated will have lost money in a movement that existed only within crypto platforms.
-- Price
Tokenized Stocks: Real Opportunity, Underestimated Risk
The market for tokenized stocks and perpetual stock contracts on crypto exchanges has been growing rapidly. The thesis is attractive: democratizing access to global assets, allowing trading outside business hours, and reducing entry barriers. However, Saturday's episode exposes a structural fragility that the sector has yet to resolve.
Without institutional market makers, circuit breakers, and a price reference for the underlying asset, these markets operate under radically different conditions than traditional exchanges. The technological infrastructure allows everything to function in terms of execution. The problem lies in the market microstructure: who provides liquidity when there is no real price?
For the investor, the lesson is straightforward. Trading stocks via crypto perpetuals over the weekend is fundamentally different from trading during market hours. The spread is wider, liquidity is lower, and the risk of cascading liquidation is exponentially higher. The $52 million evaporated in ten minutes is an expensive reminder that 24/7 access does not mean 24/7 security.
The traditional market has its limitations and restricted hours for reasons that go beyond convention. Circuit breakers, opening and closing auctions, and the presence of regulated market makers exist to prevent exactly this type of spiral. When the crypto ecosystem imports traditional assets without importing these protections, the result can be what we saw on Saturday.
This content is provided for general informational purposes only and doesn't constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Any events, rewards, online promotions, or related information mentioned herein should not be considered a recommendation, solicitation, or invitation to purchase, sell, trade, or otherwise deal in any crypto assets. Crypto assets are highly volatile and may result in loss. The availability of WEEX services, products, and related events may vary by region. You are responsible for ensuring that your participation is in accordance with applicable local laws and regulations.
You may also like

Hyperliquid Seeks U.S. Regulations for Blockchain Protection

US AI Stocks Plunge, South Korea's Crypto Tax Policy Update

Citrini Releases Report Bullish on RWA Tokenization, Focuses on Profit Attribution

Ripple opens Wall Street’s door to Hyperliquid’s $59 billion trading market

Ripple Launches 24/7 Trading in Perpetual Swaps for Institutional Clients

Stripe's Revenue Increases Nearly 9 Times After Acquiring Privy, Wallet Assets Grow Approximately 25 Times

Hyperliquid Plans to Introduce the Entire Financial Industry

Star Xu Slams CZ: Has the '1011 Crash' Been Settled?

CoinGecko Q3 2026 Report: Crypto Market Cap Rises 39.6% as Spot Volume Falls

Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain: The 3 Favorite Blockchains for Tokenization According to Grayscale

Hyperliquid Founder Calls for Regulatory Obligations to Be Imposed on Market Operators

Panel Discussion on Mass Adoption of Cryptocurrencies

EQX Labs Launches Hyperliquid Tokenization Protocol for US Stocks and ETFs

Creators Speak | In the New Cycle, How Should Investors Find 'Value Coins'?

Dialogue with Haotian: Don't Just Chase Memes in the Early Bull Market! Robinhood's Next Moves are Hooks, Agents, and Tokenized Stock DeFi

HYPE Spot ETF Sees Net Outflow of $4.95 Million in a Single Day

EQX Launches First 11 Markets on Hyperliquid

Raoul Pal Identifies Four Categories of Sustainable Blockchain Projects

Hyperliquid HIP-3 Generates $75 Million in Revenue, $37.5 Million Allocated for Token Buyback and Burn

DeepSigma: Former Goldman Sachs and Citadel Executives Launch Perpetuals on Stocks and Commodities

Federal Reserve's Bowman Says No Rush to Adjust Rates, Standard Chartered Approved to Launch Cryptocurrency Trading Services

The Uncomfortable Truth Behind 90% of AI Payments

Polymarket Revives Speculation on Unique Token and Airdrop

Why Most Public Chains Are Doomed to Fail, According to Real Vision Founder

Variational RWA Perpetual Contract Trading Volume Surpasses Trade.xyz for the First Time

Why NEAR is the Narrative King of This Cycle?

10.11 One Year Later: Has Confidence and Liquidity Recovered? Where Are We Now?

Next Bull Run: The 4 Cryptos That Bitwise's CIO Refuses to Let Go

I asked Claude for a tier list of altcoins that have a chance to beat Bitcoin. The results are surprising











